A spoonful of sugar goes down
remarkably well in Disney’s interpretation of the Mary Poppins origins tale.
![]() |
Photo by Francois Duhamel © 2013 - Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures |
Walt Disney’s painful fight for the rights to adapt P.L. Travis’ Mary
Poppins has been kept mainly under the table until now. Unbeknownst to cheery
moviegoers of the 60s who lapped up the sing along songs and dancing cartoon
penguins, pre-production of the widely successful musical was less than chirpy.
It’s
no secret to those involved that the working relationship between ‘Uncle Walt’ and ‘Pamela’
was less than amiable during the making of the film. Saving Mr. Banks tells the untold story of author Pamela Travers who
was fiercely protective of her characters, only succumbing to Disney’s wishes
after her finances were bled dry.
After 20 years of playing cat-and-mouse, Travers (wonderfully
incarnated by Emma Thompson) begrudgingly agrees to fly to Los Angeles to discuss the film adaptation
of her beloved book with Disney (Tom Hanks). Here we witness the steeliness of their rapport
to near perfection, particularly in Travers’ fear of selling out and Disney’s
sense of desperation to get his film made. Although fairy dust has been
sprinkled on history with a certain amount of liberty taking in the suggestion
of reconciliation between the author and the popular showman, Saving Mr. Banks plays with just the
right amount of depth and levity to please most audiences.
Unyielding in her determination, Travers is very toffee-nosed
about everything Hollywood and scoffs at the idea of a musical adaptation. We
see through flashbacks her early life in Australia with a feckless but charming
father (played by Colin Farrell), the source of inspiration for the Mr Banks
character. Piece by piece, biographical details break down her frosty exterior,
unveiling a hurt little girl whose childhood was cut short.
Director John Lee Hancock
(of the also brazenly fictionalised The Blind Side) is obviously no
adversary to sentimentality. The sweetened screenplay by Kelly Marcel and Sue
Smith risks caricaturing
one note characters but remains safe in the hands of Hanks and Thompson, who
prove to be charming, layered and surprisingly moving. (Even if little details such
as Disney’s infamously pushy and demanding demeanor and his resistance to work with women in positions of power are
left out.) Unsurprisingly, the writers had trouble reconciling the more obscure
aspects of Travers’ personal life for a mainstream audience in original drafts
of the script. Her fascination with Eastern
religions is merely hinted at; while a troubling relationship with her adopted
son and tales of her romantic liaisons are omitted completely. Wisely, Saving Mr. Banks has stripped away the
excess and irrelevance, striking a palatable blend of fact and fiction.
Emma Thompson is rightly receiving accolades for her performance having
already accumulated several award nominations and being tipped for an Oscar
nomination. With a theatrically trained background, she does a formidable job
at pushing past her strict haughty persona. Not only is she riotously funny,
but inwardly deeply conflicted. Few actresses could pull of what she does, rooting
Travers’ comedic complexity and melancholy in a real sense of reality.
In the context of a feel-good family flick, there is little to complain
about Saving Mr. Banks. It’s hard not
to be charmed by the lovable, smile-inducing, dare-I-say magical sentimentality
the story is coated in. Fans of Mary Poppins will lap it up, as did I.